Yamaha Announces Safety Concerns About
Rhino Atv Models 450, 660 And 700

The trial lawyers at Keefe Bartels are experienced in handling cases involving defective, dangerous and recalled products. The firm has a national network of attorneys experienced in representing people injured because of defects in various types of motor vehicles including automobiles, trucks, motorcycles, and all terrain vehicles (ATVs). On March 31, 2009, the Yamaha Motor Corp. (Yamaha) announced a “voluntary repair program,” which others might rightly consider a recall of the Rhino 700, Rhino 660 and Rhino 450 Side x Side (SxS) models. This repair program or recall has been offered in cooperation with the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) to address safety issues with these very popular recreational ATV vehicles from the Yamaha motor corporation, which is based in Japan. Dangerous, defective products can cause serious personal injury and accidents and cause loss of a job, income, medical bills and pain and suffering. If you have been the victim of a dangerous or defective ATV / all terrain vehicle, or other motor vehicle, then you should consult with an attorney or lawyer to discuss your rights and to protect your interests.

The CPSC had conducted investigations of over 50 accidents involving these three Rhino ATV models, which included 46 driver and passenger deaths involving the Rhino 450 and/or 660. The CPSC indicated that over two-thirds of these accidents involved rollovers. The rollovers in these fatal accidents and hundreds of reported incidents appeared to involve turns at “relatively low speeds and on level terrain.” The CPSC estimates that about 120,000 Rhino 450 and Rhino 660 ATV vehicles have been distributed nationwide since the fall of 2003. It appears a recall is in order. The original news release by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission on these dangerous Rhino vehicles can be viewed at http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml09/09172.html.

Yamaha’s voluntary program of these dangerous ATV vehicles provides the following two repairs, which the CPSC states are necessary “to help reduce the chance of rollover and improve vehicle handling:”

  1. Installation of a spacer on each of the rear wheels.
  2. Removal of the rear anti-sway bar.

The parts and repairs will be freely provided by local Yamaha ATV dealers. Yamaha also reminds Rhino all terrain vehicle owners that they can have doors and additional passenger holds (an earlier measure taken to improve safety and prevent rollovers) installed on their Rhino ATVs free of charge.

Yamaha’s announcement clearly states that individuals “should not operate” or should “suspend use of the Rhino” until the Rhino ATV is modified with these repair parts. Despite the strict safety warning in its press release, Yamaha then stated that its Rhino SxS vehicles are safe and reliable off-road ATV vehicles. Apparently the Rhino is the best-selling SxS vehicle in the market and Yamaha believes it is the best in its class and has a history of not being a dangerous product. Regardless of the popularity of the Rhino ATV, the numbers of reported Rhino accidents and the CPSC investigation have discovered a potential danger and defect with these vehicles which both authorities and the company are now informing consumers about.

The reported accidents involving the Rhino ATVs have demonstrated that the use of such vehicles has a potential association with serious or fatal injuries. When any product is found to be defective or dangerous to the consumer using it, there may be a potential legal claim based on product liability law against the manufacturer and other parties. Therefore it is very important to find experienced and qualified legal representation to advance the potential rights and interests of those persons harmed in Rhino ATV accidents and motor vehicle crashes.

Products liability law concerns the duty of manufacturers and sellers to make and sell products that are reasonably safe to consumers. Manufacturers owe this duty to direct users of the product, to reasonably foreseeable users of the product, and to those who may reasonably be expected to come into contact with the product. A successful products liability claim against a manufacturer proves that the product causing harm was not reasonably safe for its intended purposes. A product is not reasonably safe for its intended purpose if it fits into one or more of these types: a manufacturing defect, failure to adequately warn or instruct, or, a design defect. Therefore, if the Rhino ATV is defective, which makes it unreasonably safe for its intended use, and a party is injured or harmed, there may be a basis to file a products liability claim.

The personal injury lawyers at Keefe Bartels are available to discuss your accident and help you find the right legal representation in your potential case involving the Yamaha Rhino ATVs. If you or someone you know has been injured while operating the Rhino 450, 660 or 700 ATV, you may have a legal claim or lawsuit related to these potentially defective or potentially unsafe all terrain vehicles. Contact the trial attorneys at Keefe Bartels, LLC to see if they can help you.

Contact Now
CAPTCHA
Image text Send e-mail
May 15 2013
a $1 Million settlement just prior to trial in April 2013 from an ATV dealer defendant on a strict liability failure to warn claim. While substantial in amount, this settlement is especially significant because of the inherent difficulties of failure to warn claims against ATV manufacturers and dealers.
May 10 2013
By: Kate Coscarelli of the New Jersey Law Journal
A Monmouth County lawyer, who has served as a New Jersey State Bar Association trustee and president of Trial Attorneys of New Jersey, will be the next secretary of the state bar association.
May 07 2013
In June of 2012, Stryker initiated a voluntary recall of its Rejuvenate and ABG II modular-neck hip stems due to the potential for fretting and corrosion at the modular-neck junction.
May 07 2013
Stephen G. GrygielStephen Grygiel discusses what a number of lawyers and their clients contend are serious illegalities in Facebook’s user tracking. Without proper disclosure or user consent, Facebook has tracked and gathered user’s personal information, including data about where we go and what we do on the internet.
May 07 2013
Jennifer L. Harwood, Esq.Mesothelioma, lung cancer and asbestosis are debilitating diseases, and affect victim’s lives deeply. Mesothelioma is a rare and very aggressive type of cancer that has been positively linked to exposure to asbestos. The disease can be fatal and affects the lining of the lung, the chest cavity or the abdomen. 2,000 to 3,000 cases of this type of cancer are diagnosed annually.
Apr 30 2013
New Brunswick, N.J. – John E. Gregory, Jr. of Keefe Bartels represented the Estate of Antonio Teixeira concerning a single tractor-trailer accident case in New Jersey Superior Court - Middlesex County, where Mr. Teixeira suffered catastrophic closed head injuries as a result.
Apr 18 2013
Class Actions" on April 18, 2013 at the New Jersey Association for Justice 2013 Boardwalk Seminar. Click here to download the presentation file (.ppt)
Apr 11 2013
Three seek second-vice president post; two vie for secretary; four face-off for at-large trustee; NJSBA members will vote on candidates and proposed bylaw changes. An election will be held to determine a trio of leadership positions for the New Jersey State Bar Association.
Mar 13 2013
March 3, 2013 – Los Angeles jurors voted today to award $8.3 million to Mr. Loren “Bill” Kransky, a Montana man injured by a faulty DePuy hip replacement part. The man reportedly received his hip implant, a metal on metal unit, in 2007.
Mar 13 2013
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a Class I Recall for LPS Diaphyseal Sleeves, commonly used in knee replacement surgeries, on February 15, 2013. A Class I Recall is the most severe recall issued by the FDA, indicating the potential for serious injury or death.
Subscribe to our eNews
Email:
For Email Marketing you can trust